Creitser

People v. Creitser

Good Law
1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 203·25 Cal. App. 647·145 P. 109
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 31, 1914Crim. No. 262.California1,149 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

The defendant pleaded guilty, in the superior court of Del Norte County, to an information charging him with the crime of rape upon a female under the age of consent, May Bartol by name—a name by no means unfamiliar to this court, its possessor having been the victim of similar mistreatment to that charged against the defendant by four other parties, who were convicted of the offense and who unavailingly appealed their cases to this court. (See People v. Bartol, 24 Cal. App. 659, [142 Pac. 510]; People v. Hoosier, 24 Cal. App. 746 , [ 142 Pac. 514 ]; People v. Horn, ante, p. 583, [ 144 Pac. 641 ]; People v. Taggart, ante, p. 628, [ 144 Pac. 1197 ], the opinion in which was filed in this court on October 27, 1914.)

The present appeal is from the judgment and the order denying the defendant a new trial, ‘ ‘ and from each and every order of said superior court made after pronouncing judgment in the above entitled cause. ’ ’

There has been no record of the testimony filed in this court, nor are there any briefs on file herein. There was no ap'pearance in behalf of the defendant when the cause was regularly called on the calendar at the last regular term of the court, and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.