Blanchard

Blanchard v. Haig

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 452·57 Cal. App. 665·207 P. 942
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 12, 1922Civ. No. 4054.California642 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tyler, J.

This action was one brought to recover certain sums of money and other personal property of the value of $1,789.67, which it is alleged defendant received as agent of the plaintiff. Defendant, by answer, denied plaintiff’s allegations, and by way of counterclaim alleged that plaintiff was indebted to him in the sum of $858.75. Relief was refused both parties and plaintiff appeals.

It appears from the record that on or about November 1, 1917, the parties hereto entered into an agreement whereby they undertook to operate a jewelry and repair-shop with defendant as manager. Plaintiff agreed to furnish the stock in trade and the store where the business was to be conducted, and to pay defendant for his services one-lialf of all the profits derived from sales. The trial court found, among other facts, that the total cost of merchandise purchased by plaintiff and furnished to defendant as manager, for the purposes of sale, amounted to the sum of $5,603.64. It further found that the total cost price of certain goods sold amounted to $1,584.36, and that an inventory of the merchandise on hand at the close of defendant’s employ ment showed goods to the value of $2,229.61. Other findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.