Hunt

Hunt v. Empire Securities Co.

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 90·50 Cal. App. 43·194 P. 744
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 18, 1920Civ. No. 3228.California417 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Weller, J.

This action of interpleader was instituted by the county treasurer of Los Angeles County to compel the defendants to litigate among themselves their claims to certain bonds held by him in his official capacity and representing the contract price of road work done by George L. Carroll, as contractor, under the provisions of the Road District Improvement Act of 1907. (Stats. 1907, p. 806.)

The controversy here arises between the Empire Securities Company (assignee of Carroll, the contractor) and various parties who furnished materials and labor in the performance of the contracts with the county, hereinafter designated as lien claimants. These lien claimants base their rights to payment, from the' funds in the custody of the county treasurer upon the fact that they served stop notices on the proper officers in accordance with the provisions of section 1184 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and thereby effected an equitable garnishment of such portion of the contract price as might be necessary to satisfy their demands. This contention was sustained by the superior court, and the Empire Securities Company appeals from the judgment ordering the bonds sold and the proceeds of such sale…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.