Camp

Camp v. Oakland Mortgage & Finance Co.

Good Law
128 Cal. App. 238·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 220·17 P.2d 151
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 17, 1932Docket No. 8390.California854 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

King, J.

The action is to recover from the Oakland Mortgage & Finance Company the residue or balance of a loan fund remaining in the hands of the Mortgage Company, the loan having been theretofore arranged by one George Phillips and wife to meet progress payments on a building erected for them by one G. R. Sterne as contractor.

This instrument reads:

Several other persons made demand for the balance remaining in its hands under the loan arrangement, and being unable to determine to whom it should pay the same, the Oakland Mortgage & Finance Company moved the court below, in accordance with the requirements of section 386 of the Code of Civil Procedure, before answer filed, for an order discharging it from liability and dismissing it from the action, upon payment into court of the sum in dispute, and substituting in its place all of the adverse claimants. This order the court granted.

Thereafter, and by and with the consent of the owners of the building, the defendant Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, one of the substituted defendants, did pay and discharge the liens and claims of the several other substituted defendants, thus leaving itself as the only defendant in the case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.