Couldthirst

Couldthirst v. Southern Pacific Railroad

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 245·49 Cal. App. 525·193 P. 796
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 11, 1920Civ. No. 2128.California962 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

The action was brought in a justice court of Lassen County to recover damages for the killing of certain stock belonging to plaintiffs. The claim was based upon the provisions of section 485 of the Civil Code, as amended in 1915 (Stats. 1915, p. 1281), requiring railroads to maintain fences on both sides of the railroad track and making them responsible for injury to stock caused by failure to observe said duty. A demurrer was interposed upon various grounds, including the want of jurisdiction of the subject of the action and of the person of the defendant and the failure to state a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained upon the ground of the want of jurisdiction of the justice court, and the action was thereupon dismissed. Plaintiffs then appealed to the superior court “on questions of both law and fact.” The superior court affirmed the judg ment of the lower court sustaining said demurrer. Among the allegations of the amended complaint is the following: “That plaintiffs for several years last past have been and now are the owners of the following described land, situate, lying and being in Lassen County, State of California and more particularly described as follows to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.