Grisso

Grisso v. Board of Medical Examiners

Good Law
1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 80·75 Cal. App. 385·242 P. 912
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 1, 1925Docket No. 5336.California1,113 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Langdon, J.

This is an appeal hy the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon an order sustaining a general and .special demurrer to an amended petition for writ of review.

The petition sets forth that Davis Grisso was a duly licensed and practicing physician and surgeon in the state of California; that a complaint was duly and regularly filed against him by the state Board of Medical Examiners, charging him with unprofessional conduct under section 14 of the Medical Practice Act, subdivision 8 thereof (Stats. 1913, p. 732, as amended by Stats. 1921, p. 1012); that he filed an answer thereto ánd a partial hearing was had in July, 1923, at the city and county of San Praneisco, California; that the matter was continued to a subsequent meeting of the Board at Sacramento, California, in the month of October, 1923, when and where the hearing was concluded. Dr. Grisso was found guilty as charged and his license was revoked. A transcript of the evidence produced before the Board was appended to the petition for the writ of review, which petition was filed in the superior court of the state of California in and for the city and county of San Praneisco.

Defendant filed a demurrer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.