Deakins

Deakins v. Superior Court

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 198·90 Cal. App. 630·266 P. 563
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 4, 1928Docket No. 5999.California1,579 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

This is an original proceeding to compel the respondent court to proceed to trial in the case of Grover C. Deakins v. Leland S. Hamer. The material facts are: Plaintiff filed a complaint in the Superior Court wherein he alleged that he and the defendant were the owners of a certain invention and device known as a joint breaker and tong puller; that on November 10, 1921, they entered into a contract with one Wilcox by which Wilcox was to manu facture one complete device and working model for demonstration purposes and to pay for an application for patent thereon which all three of the parties were to jointly make; that by the same contract it was agreed that each of the parties should own a one-third interest in the invention or any improvement which might be made by any of them and that any net income which might be derived by the parties or any of them as the result of the manufacture or sale of the invention or any improvement thereon, should inure to the joint benefit of the parties in equal shares, and that each of the three should be entitled to an accounting thereof. It is further alleged that subsequent to the execution of this contract Wilcox surrendered and released to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.