Lowe

Lowe v. Los Angeles Suburban Gas Co.

Good Law
1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 84·24 Cal. App. 367·141 P. 399
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 1914Civ. No. 1477.California4,705 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 369 This action was filed by William G. Gallagher as plaintiff for the purpose of foreclosing upon a trust-deed alleged to have been executed by Los Angeles Suburban Gas Company, a corporation, to secure the payment of certain bonds alleged to have been executed by said corporation. Leon P. Lowe, having succeeded to such rights as the plaintiff possessed in the subject matter of the action, said Leon P. Lowe was substituted as plaintiff instead of William G. Gallagher. The defendant Caroline W. Dobbins filed a cross-complaint alleging ownership by her of one hundred bonds of the same issue, and prayed for foreclosure of the same trust-deed above mentioned. The court having determined that the Los Angeles Suburban Gas Company received no consideration for the bonds held by the plaintiff and that it did receive consideration for those held by the cross-complainant, judgment was entered herein against the plaintiff and a decree of foreclosure in favor of the cross-complainant for the amounts due on said bonds. Appeals from the judgment and from an…

Addendum

The appellants Los Angeles Suburban Gas Company, People's Gas Company, and People's Gas Coke *Page 380 Company have filed their petition for a rehearing of this cause in the second district court of appeal. The argument presented relates to that part of the decree of foreclosure which permits a sale to enforce payment of the principal of the bonds as well as the accrued interest thereon. In addition to the fact that (under circumstances outlined in the opinion heretofore filed) the trust-deed made it the trustee's duty "to take such action pursuant to the terms of this trust-deed as the party or parties tendering the indemnity may in writing request," we find that paragraph XII of the trust-deed provides as follows: "No bondholder or bondholders shall take any proceedings to enforce the provisions hereof until he shall have requested the trustee in writing to take proceedings and shall have tendered to the trustee satisfactory indemnity as hereinbefore provided, and the trustee shall have refused or neglected after the lapse of a reasonable time to take such proceedings." The words above quoted are equivalent to a statement that after such request and refusal the bondholders…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.