James

People v. James

Good Law
1907 Cal. App. LEXIS 304·5 Cal. App. 427·90 P. 561
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 23, 1907Crim. No. 37.California2,071 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

Appellant was tried on an information charging him with murder, and he was convicted of manslaughter. He has appealed from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial. The assignments of errors relate to certain instructions given and refused and to the action of the trial court in overruling an objection to a hypothetical question addressed to one of the witnesses for the people. We will notice in the order presented in his brief all of the points upon which appellant relies for a reversal of the judgment.

Dr. Stevenson, a medical expert for the people, was asked this question: ‘ ‘ Suppose a man weighing 130 pounds or thereabouts was struck with sufficient force by a man weighing 180, 190 or 200 pounds, to knock him down twice within a short period of time, the first blow being succeeded by a struggle, and during that struggle the smaller man was choked for a period of half a minute, at first lightly and then gradually increasing it until he let go his hold upon a revolver; after the second blow he had some difficulty in arising, but got up, walked a space of fifteen or twenty feet, or ten feet; then walked a space of thirty or forty or fifty feet without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.