Kelly

Kelly v. Kelly

Good Law
129 Cal. App. 325·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 1167·18 P.2d 781
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 1933Docket No. 8752.California1,639 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Knight, J.

Plaintiff and defendant are husband and wife, and the parents of two minor children. Differences arose between them, and although they continued to reside in the same home they had severed the marital relationship. On March 30, 1928, they entered into a written property settlement agreement, and about two years later, to wit, on December 28, 1929, plaintiff brought this action to have the agreement annulled. The judgment was that he take nothing by his action, and he has appealed.

It appears that subsequent to their marriage the parties acquired several pieces of real estate, which, shortly prior to and as part of the property settlement, they divided and for which they exchanged deeds. It also appears that plaintiff’s mother, who at the time of the making of said agreement, was well advanced in years and ill, was beneficiary of one or more trust estates then being administered in and pursuant to the laws of the state of Pennsylvania, and that in the event of her death the interests she possessed in said trust estates would descend to plaintiff. It was in the light of these present and future conditions that said agreement was drawn and executed. It declared first that its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.