Hillier

Hillier v. Muth

Good Law
132 Cal. App. 486·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 355·23 P.2d 46
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 8, 1933Docket No. 7813.California973 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Archbald, J.

Action by plaintiff to recover of defendants alleged usurious interest payments made by him. From the judgment in favor of defendants plaintiff has appealed.

On or about September 25, 1928, plaintiff made a written application to defendant Central Counties Finance Co., Inc., “for the purpose of obtaining a loan through you from the Mercantile Acceptance Corporation, or the Western States Acceptance Corporation”, with his automobile as security. The amount of the loan applied for was $1,000 for twelve months, and in the application plaintiff agreed to pay said defendant company a commission of seven and one-half per cent for its services in procuring it, “said commission to be deducted” from the loan. Defendant Paul Muth was the manager of defendant Central Counties Finance Company, and was the one with whom plaintiff conducted his negotiations. Plaintiff was informed by Muth that the latter’s company did not make such loans, but that it would procure one for him from the Mercantile Acceptance Corporation, and that such corporation would require plaintiff to place insurance on his car with it. The insurance amounted to $84.10, the brokerage to be paid defendant Central Counties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.