Koping

Kierulff & Ravenscroft v. Koping

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 627·94 Cal. App. 473·271 P. 353
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 1928Docket No. 3589.California2,155 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

Plaintiffs had judgment for the sum of $500, from which judgment the defendant appeals.

The action is founded upon a written guaranty in the words and figures following, to wit:

The transcript shows that at and prior to the execution of this guaranty, V. G. Hoping, the husband of the defendant, was conducting a radio shop or store in the city of Stock ton, and that he desired to place in the store certain radio equipment or merchandise kept and sold by the plaintiff. It appears that this merchandise could only be handled by regularly licensed dealers, or at least was only sold to and through regularly licensed dealers. It further appears from the transcript that the plaintiffs, before selling such merchandise to the said V. G-. Koping, desired some guarantee as to his credit, not being satisfied with Y. G. Koping’s credit rating as it theretofore existed. In pursuance of the understanding had between the plaintiffs, Y. G. Koping and the defendant, relative to the sale and purchase of such radio equipment, the defendant signed the foregoing written guaranty, which guaranty was forwarded to the plaintiffs by the said Y. G. Koping. Thereafter, and during the course of the business…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.