Moss

Moss v. Stubbs

Good Law
111 Cal. App. 359·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1203·295 P. 572
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 1931Docket No. 7381.California4,364 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

The plaintiff, David S. Pratt, nine years of age, through his guardian ad litem, brought an action for damages on account of personal injuries he sustained as a result of being struck by a Ford truck owned by the defendant Pacific Gas & Electric Company and driven by the defendant A. D. Stubbs; and his mother Fredonia J. Moss, brought a similar action against the same parties to recover the amount of damages she claimed to have suffered as a result of the accident, including loss of services. The actions were consolidated and tried before a jury. Motions for nonsuit and directed verdicts were made by defendants, and denied; and the jury returned separate verdicts in favor of defendants. Following the entry of judgments thereon plaintiffs presented motions for new trial, which the court granted; and from the orders made in that behalf defendants have taken these appeals.

The orders are identical in form and read in part as follows: “First: That plaintiff’s instruction No. 13 was withdrawn by counsel with the understanding that the court would read from the California Vehicle Act the sections regarding the blowing of a horn referred to in said instruction which through some…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.