Coe

Coe v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 661·42 Cal. App. 479·183 P. 822
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 1919Civ. No. 2546.California1,030 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

In this action plaintiff attacks the proceedings had and taken under the provisions of the Municipal Annexation Act of 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 577), and amendments thereto, for the annexation of certain territory, known as the city of Sawtelle, to the city of Los Angeles.

To the complaint, which asks that the defendants be enjoined and restrained from further proceedings in the matter, that the election thereon be declared null and of no effect, and that the action of the city of Los Angeles, purporting to have been had pursuant to the provisions of said municipal act, be declared void and ineffectual for the purpose intended, defendants interposed a demurrer upon both general and special grounds. The demurrer was sustained without leave to amend. Judgment of dismissal followed, from which plaintiff appeals.

In our opinion, the complaint failed to state a cause of action, for want of jurisdiction. It appears therefrom that plaintiff sues as a citizen and taxpayer of the city of Sawtelle ; that a petition in due form and signed by the requisite number of electors of Sawtelle was presented to its board of trustees, in pursuance of which an ordinance was regularly adopted in due form…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.