Frutig

Frutig v. Trafton

Good Law
1905 Cal. App. LEXIS 135·2 Cal. App. 47·83 P. 70
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 20, 1905No. 148.California1,724 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hall, J.

This is an action to compel the satisfaction of a note and mortgage given for $1,000, upon the payment of the balance ofr$260 alleged to be unpaid. Plaintiff had judgment as prayed for. The appeal is from the judgment and order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The original defendant, J. P. Trafton, died subsequently to the rendition of the judgment, and the executrix of his will has been substituted as defendant. Plaintiff was a retail dealer in jewelry, and bought a hill of goods amounting to $1,070.41, of defendant, a wholesale dealer, and with his wife gave a note and mortgage to defendant to secure the payment of $1,000 thereof. The note bore date November 4, 1896, and by its terms was payable on or before November 4, 1901, without interest. During the next twelve months plaintiff, from time to time, purchased additional goods of defendant to the amount of $638.10, and during the same time made payments of $735. The court found the payments to be $740, but no point seems to be made of this difference; for other payments were made by plaintiff of taxes on the mortgage which brought the total payments to a sum in excess of $740, and the court found the balance to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.