Trabucco

Trabucco v. Collins

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 194·39 Cal. App. 412·179 P. 221
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 1919Civ. No. 2496.California587 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff. Defendant Elizabeth Collins alone appeals. Her first contention is that plaintiff’s own case proved a “novation,” by which his claim against her was extinguished ; to wit, the creation of an obligation.on a promissory note, signed by defendant If. J. Collins alone, in place of an obligation of both defendants to repay money loaned by plaintiff. She relies upon the two documents introduced in evidence by plaintiff, the first being a receipt for $476 in favor of plaintiff, signed by both defendants; the second dated later, being a promissory note in favor of plaintiff for the amount sued for, signed by defendant M. J. Collins only.

The defense of novation was not pleaded in the original answer, which denied the loan, and all, or any, indebtedness. Neither was it pleaded in the answer as amended at the conclusion of the trial, and which alleged, as a further and separate defense, that the money was paid by plaintiff in accordance with an agreement for the purchase of a one-half interest in the marble business conducted by the defendants. The finding of the court was squarely against both defendants on each of the defenses.

It…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.