Wolfe

Wolfe v. Severns

Good Law
109 Cal. App. 476·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 431·293 P. 156
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 10, 1930Docket No. 76.California4,471 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Warner, J.

This action arose out of the pretended sale of certain oil-well equipment, consisting of a derrick, tanks, tools, etc. James, Price and Richards owned certain oil leases and oil-well equipment at Huntington Beach, Orange County, California. They were in financial difficulties and made an assignment of their interest in said leases and said equipment to a certain creditors’ committee consisting of Spraul, Fairchild and Gale. Said creditors’ committee had certain negotiations with Clarence R. Bailey, Pearl R. Bailey, his wife, W. J. White, and Mamie B. White, his wife, looking to the sale of said property. In said negotiations it was agreed to sell said property to Bailey and White for an agreed consideration, payable at specified times; that they were to place all necessary papers in escrow and the delivery thereof was to be made according to the escrow instructions. The deal was never completed because of the failure of Bailey and White to carry out the terms of their agreement. Bailey and White were never in possession of the property, although they did a little work thereon by special arrangement with Spraul, one of the creditors’ committee. The appellant, as judgment creditor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.