James

James v. Oakland Traction Co.

Good Law
10 Cal. App. 785·1909 Cal. App. LEXIS 295·102 P. 1082
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 10, 1909Civ. No. 501.California4,617 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been inflicted upon the plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant.

The cause was tried by a jury, and a verdict returned in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $15,000.

The defendant appeals from the judgment entered in accordance with the terms of said verdict and from the order denying it a new trial.

A reversal of the judgment and the order is insisted upon because the evidence, it is claimed, is insufficient to justify the verdict, and because of alleged erroneous rulings admitting and rejecting certain testimony and for giving and refusing to give certain instructions.

1. The claim as to the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict is founded upon the contention that the testimony of the plaintiff and of the other witnesses testifying in her behalf describing the circumstances under which the accident occurred is inherently improbable. It is, therefore, the position of counsel for the appellant that there is not that conflict in the evidence upon the salient points in the case which would preclude, under our constitutional provision confining the appellate jurisdiction of courts of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.