McLaren

McLaren v. Hards

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 14·39 Cal. App. 104·178 P. 332
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 10, 1918Civ. No. 2614.California549 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Myers, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Appellant informs us in his brief that this was a creditor’s suit under sections 3439, 3441, and 3442 of the Civil Code to avoid and set aside alleged voluntary and fraudulent conveyances from defendant J. Fred Hards to a Mrs. Slatter, and from the latter to defendant Beatrice E. Hards, wife of the first-named defendant. From statements in his brief we gather that appellant predicates his appeal upon claimed insufficiency of the evidence to support certain findings of the court below. The record comes to us under the “alternative method” in typewritten transci'ipts. Neither the findings nor any part thereof is printed in appellant’s brief; nor is there printed any portion of the pleadings framing issues to which such findings would he responsive.

The reporter’s transcript covers 133 typewritten pages. The only portion thereof printed in the brief is the following:

It is apparent that there is nothing here which is necessarily inconsistent with a finding in favor of the defendants upon the question of a valuable consideration, if such an issue was framed and such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.