Frederick

Tuolumne Water Power Co. v. Frederick

Good Law
13 Cal. App. 498·1910 Cal. App. LEXIS 157·110 P. 134
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 30, 1910Civ. No. 712.California2,400 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cooper, J.

This action was brought to condemn a right of way over defendant’s lands for an electric power line. The ease was tried with the aid of a jury, and a verdict rendered fixing the amount of defendant’s damages at $450. Judgment was accordingly entered in favor of plaintiff as prayed and fixing the damages for the right of way at the sum so found by the jury.

Defendant prosecutes this appeal from the judgment and order.

The first contention made by defendant is that the court erred in overruling his demurrer to the complaint. His argument is that the complaint does not show that the use for which it is sought to condemn the property is a public use. The Code of Civil Procedure provides (section 1238) as follows:

“Subject to the provision of this title the right of eminent domain may be exercised in behalf of the following public uses ...

“12. Canals, reservoirs, dams, ditches, flumes, aqueducts and pipes and outlets natural or otherwise for supplying, storing, and discharging water for the operation of machinery for the purpose of generating and transmitting electricity for the supply of mines, quarries, railroads, tramways, mills and factories with electric power; and also for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.