Wahl

Wahl v. McCaddon

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 152·79 Cal. App. 294·249 P. 222
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 1926Docket No. 3139.California427 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finch, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant McCaddon from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The only question presented by the appeal is whether, at the time the action was commenced, it was barred by the statute of limitations in so far as it is based upon a certain promissory note.

In January, 1922, Alice C. Moore, now deceased, was indebted to John Wahl, also now deceased, in certain sums of money, evidenced by three promissory notes, secured by mortgages on real estate, the note in question being dated February 2, 1917, and payable one year after the date thereof. During the month first mentioned the parties to the notes executed an instrument, reciting the execution of the notes and that Alice C. Moore was desirous of securing an extension of time for the payment thereof, and providing as follows: “Now therefore in consideration.of one dollar, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, it is mutually agreed between the said John Wahl and said Alice Copeland Moore that the time of payment of the principal sum- as mentioned in each of the three promissory notes and in accordance with the terms and conditions thereof is hereby extended for a period of one year from the 27th day of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.