[1] Divorce—Conflicting Testimony—Findings-—Appeal.—Where in an action for divorce the testimony of the parties and of their witnesses is sharply in conflict as to practically every issue involved, and the findings of the trial court are fully supported by the testimony offered on behalf of the defendant, the judgment in his favor on his cross-complaint, based upon such findings, will not be disturbed on appeal.

[2] Id.—Continuances—Absence of Witnesses—Discretion of Trial Court.—The matter of the granting or denial of continuances for the -purpose of enabling a party to procure the presence and testimony of absent witnesses lies very largely within the discretion of the trial judge; and it must be made to appear very clearly that such discretion has been abused before the cause will be reversed upon appeal for an alleged error of the court in denying a continuance.

[3] Id.—Denial of Continuance—Discretion not Abused.—It is not an abuse of discretion to deny a motion for a continuance for the purpose of enabling a party to procure the attendance of an absent witness, where the affidavit and other documents presented upon the hearing of such motion utterly fail to show that the absent witness is the only witness who can give evidence as to the matters for which his presence is desired, or that the party requesting the continuance is not provided with the presence and testimony of other witnesses to every matter respecting which the absent witness could testify.

[4] Id.—Custody of Minor—Conflicting Testimony—Order Conclusive.—In an action for divorce, an order, based upon conflicting testimony, awarding the custody of a minor child to his father during the pendency of the trial and during certain periods after the entry of the judgment therein will not be disturbed on appeal.

2. Continuance to procure witness who is beyond the jurisdiction, note, Xi. R. A. I918E, 527.