Armstrong

Armstrong v. Sacramento Valley Realty Co.

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 495·44 Cal. App. 1·185 P. 874
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 28, 1919Civ. No. 2057.California552 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is an application for a writ of supersedeas to prevent plaintiff from talcing any proceeding in the superior court of Glenn County in execution of a. certain judgment rendered therein in favor of plaintiff and against the defendants.

The record shows that on the fourteenth day of July, 1919, a certain paper in said action, signed by the judge, was filed; the defendants presuming it to be a final judgment in the case, took an appeal therefrom to the supreme court of the state, and filed a bond in an amount sufficient to stay proceedings ; thereafter, on the twenty-second day of September, 1919, the judge who tried said case signed and filed another paper purporting to be a final judgment in said action; from this action the defendants have also appealed and given a bond in the sum of three hundred dollars, but no bond to stay execution.

The petitioners for the writ herein allege that the plaintiff is threatening to, and will, unless restrained, proceed by execution to enforce the alleged judgment filed on September 22, 1919; they also allege that the first judgment filed in said action was a final judgment and that the second document was a nullity, that the only judgment in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.