McLean

McLean v. Mooser

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 61·59 Cal. App. 345·210 P. 827
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 1922Civ. No. 4238.California1,618 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Langdon, J.

This appeal is taken by the defendants from a judgment against them in an action upon a promissory note for $1,598, signed by them jointly, payable to Messrs. Dudley and McLean and by them assigned to plaintiff.

The complaint was the usual one to recover upon a promissory note. The answer alleged that at the time of the execution of said note it was secured by a pledge of certain jewels; that the original payees of the note sold said jewels ■for a sum in excess of the amount of the note and have refused to account to defendants for the- sale or to pay over the surplus to defendants; that no notice was given by the pledgees to the pledgor of the time and place of the sale of the pledged property and that the said property was not sold in accordance with the provisions of the law of this state. As a separate defense, defendants alleged the pledge of said jewels and that said jewels were being held by said Dudley and McLean, original payees of the note; that defendants have demanded the sale of said jewels and the application of the proceeds thereof to the payment of the note, but that said Dudley and McLean have refused to comply with said demand; also that defendants have demanded…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.