Young

Young v. Lial

Good Law
128 Cal. App. 246·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 218·17 P.2d 170
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 17, 1932Docket No. 4652.California938 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment which was rendered against him. The motion was duly made pursuant to the provisions of section 663 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The appeal is presented on a bill of exceptions. The evidence which was adduced at the trial is not before this court.

The plaintiffs, as the assignees of the California Breeders Service Company, brought suit upon a written contract to enforce payment of the agreed purchase price of seventeen Holstein cows and twenty-three heifers, alleged to have been sold and delivered to the defendant. The complaint avers that “plaintiffs rely wholly on (the) written contract”. The prayer demands judgment for $1807.50, together with interest, costs and stipulated counsel fees. Incident to the suit the cattle were taken and held by the sheriff under a writ of attachment.

The answer denies that the defendant entered into the contract with the California Breeders Service Company; denies the execution of the alleged contract; denies the consideration therefor, and denies all of the other material allegations of the complaint. As a separate defense the answer alleges that at the time of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.