Gittelson

Gittelson v. McKnight

Good Law
1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 235·75 Cal. App. 698·243 P. 889
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 22, 1925Docket No. 5277.California2,221 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Langdon, J.

This is an appeal by some of the defendants from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs decreeing specific performance of an agreement for the purchase and sale of real property in Los Angeles, California. The record bears out the statement of facts appearing in respondents’ brief, from which we quote:

The initial negotiations were carried on between the defendant John H. McKnight for the sellers and Max Gittelson, father of the plaintiffs George, Harry, and Samuel Gittelson, in behalf of the purchasers, which negotiations finally resulted in an offer in writing by said John H. McKnight and an acceptance by said Max Gittlelson; the consideration was $32,000 net to the sellers, $10,000 to be paid in cash, the balance of the purchase price to be by note secured by mortgage on the property, due in five or seven years at eight per cent interest.

On July 9, 1921, Max Gittelson, the agent, brought the purchasers, his sons, and John H. McKnight, the seller, together. Samuel Gittelson, one of the purchasers, accompanied John H. McKnight, the seller, to the office of the Title Company, where they reaffirmed the terms of the contract and signed escrow instructions to the Title Company, which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.