Harding

Harding v. Dam

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 546·36 Cal. App. 748·173 P. 604
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 10, 1918Civ. No. 2406.California922 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

This is an appeal by defendants from an order refusing to vacate a sale of mortgaged premises and a deficiency judgment, and to recall a certificate of sale and an execution, in a foreclosure suit.

Prior to April 29, 1916, a judgment of foreclosure had been entered against the defendants, and on that date defendant F. H. Dam, contemplating an appeal, and being himself an attorney, wrote to Richard Belcher, attorney for the plaintiff, advising him of his intention to take an appeal from such judgment, and added: “I expect to file my stay bond at the same time that I file my notice of appeal, and in the meantime to bring on a hearing to fix the amount of the stay bond. My understanding is that it was verbally stipulated between us that execution pending the foregoing proceedings will be stayed.”

This letter was answered by Belcher on May 1, 1916, as follows: “I am in receipt of yours of the 29th, inclosing a copy of order extending time and notice requesting the preparation of transcript of the record. It would be useless of course for me to advertise a sale while- these matters were pending, and I shall not do so.”

On this same day, May 1st, Dam, evidently not having received…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.