Stephens

Stephens v. Anderson

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 489·36 Cal. App. 199·171 P. 811
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 1918Civ. No. 2107.California601 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

This action was brought to recover a sum of money alleged to have been earned by the plaintiff in negotiating a sale of certain real property owned by the defendants. Subsequent to the commencement of the action C. M. Stephens died and his executor was substituted as party plaintiff. At the trial, after evidence had been introduced on behalf of the plaintiff, the trial judge, agreeable to motion made by the defendants, ordered judgment of nonsuit, which was thereafter entered and from which this appeal is taken.

It is claimed on behalf of the appellant that there was evidence to sustain the allegations of the plaintiff’s complaint. It appears from the bill of exceptions that C. M. Stephens was the general attorney of defendants, particularly of Nathalie Anderson, and that in the year 1911 defendants gave a written statement to said Stephens wherein they particularly described certain real property and further stated: “Our price for the above two tracts is $25,000.00 cash, or half cash, balance secured by mortgage payable at one year at six per cent net. Will pay C. M. Stephens five per cent commission on sale.” One Leonis testified that while acting as agent for a corporation,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.