Pinello

Pinello v. Taylor

Good Law
128 Cal. App. 508·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 1244·17 P.2d 1039
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 1933Docket No. 8554.California2,020 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jamison, J.

Plaintiffs are husband and wife. This is an action for damages for injuries sustained by the wife, alleged to have been struck by an automobile operated by defendant, while the said wife was attempting to walk across Geary Street at its intersection with Ninth Avenue in the city of San Francisco.

The case was tried by a jury, verdict was rendered in favor of defendant, a motion for a new trial was denied and judgment was thereupon entered for said defendant, and from this judgment plaintiffs have appealed.

As grounds for reversal appellants contend that the court erred in giving a certain instruction for respondent, and refusing three asked for by appellants. In order to determine whether or not the court erred in giving and refusing to give said instructions a brief review of the evidence is necessary. Geary Street runs easterly and westerly and Ninth Avenue northerly and southerly; Geary Street being about eighty-two feet wide. At the intersection of said streets there are located traffic “Stop” and “Go” signals and marked pedestrian lanes leading across Geary Street. Appellant Steffana Pinello testified that she lived about half a block south of said intersection on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.