Sutton-Watts

Sutton-Watts v. Sarnow

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 8·80 Cal. App. 91·251 P. 654
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 1, 1926Docket No. 5293.California2,223 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Knight, J.

An action by the plaintiff as vendee to obtain a decree rescinding a sale of the leasehold interest in an apartment house and of the furniture contained therein; also for the recovery of the initial payment made on the purchase price and the cancellation of a promissory note and chattel mortgage given in payment of the balance. Judgment was given in favor of plaintiff and defendant appeals, urging as grounds for reversal that the trial court erred in failing to find on material issues raised by the answer, and that the judgment is erroneous in that it makes no provision for the return to defendant of the furniture nor does it allow her certain credits to which she claims she is entitled.

The written consent to the assignment of the lease, which was necessary to be obtained before a valid transfer thereof could be made, was signed by Priscilla Erode as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Adolph Erode, who was the owner of the premises during his lifetime and by whom the lease had been executed, but it appears that up to the time she signed said written consent she had not been appointed administratrix. Respondent claimed, therefore, that the leasehold interest…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.