Blakeley

Blakeley v. Kingsbury

Good Law
1907 Cal. App. LEXIS 189·6 Cal. App. 707·93 P. 129
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 1, 1907Civ. No. 364.California2,823 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

On the tenth day of December, 1903, plaintiff filed in the office of the surveyor general and register of the land office her duly verified application to purchase from the state under the provisions of an act entitled “An Act regulating the sale of the lands uncovered by the recession or drainage of the waters of inland lakes and unsegregated swamp and overflowed lands and validating sales and surveys heretofore made,” approved March 24, 1893 [Stats. 1893, p. 341], all of section 15, in township 22 south, range 18 east, M. D. M., situated in Kings county, this state.

The said application contained the statement of facts required by law.

On June 10, 1904, the application was approved by the surveyor general of the state, and on July 30, 1904, plaintiff paid twenty per cent of the purchase money and the interest on the balance till January 1, 1905, and on August 5, 1904, the surveyor general issued to plaintiff a certificate of purchase.

Afterward, the board of supervisors of Kings county formed a reclamation district including all of said section 15.

Plaintiff paid the assessments levied by said board on her land.

On June 5, 1905, after proper proof was received, the said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.