Spangler v. Pasadena City Board Of Education

Good Law
519 F.2d 430·1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14835
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 5, 197574-2116California10,843 words

Opinion

Opinion

519 F.2d 430 Nancy Anne SPANGLER, by her father and next friend, James E. Spangler, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, v. PASADENA CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 74-2116. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 5, 1975. Lee G. Paul (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Brian K. Landsberg, Dept. of Justice (argued), Washington, D. C., and Fred Okrand (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees. OPINION Before CHAMBERS, ELY and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. ELY, Circuit Judge: 1 The appellants, Pasadena (California) City Board of Education (hereafter Board) and some of its officials, individually, appeal from an Order of the District Court, reported at 375 F.Supp. 1304 (C.D.Cal.1974), which denied the Board's motions for: (1) relief from the District Court's Order of January 23, 1970, requiring the desegregation of the Pasadena public schools and the District Court's Order of March 10, 1970, which approved the then Board's Pasadena Plan for desegregation; (2) dissolution of the District Court's injunction requiring that there be no school in the School District with a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.