Croghan

People v. Croghan

Good Law
131 Cal. App. 351·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 742·21 P.2d 614
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 24, 1933Docket No. 242.California1,694 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Campbell, J.

The appellant, tax collector of San Diego County, was tried on two indictments, one of which contained 20 counts alleging 12 separate offenses and termed the “Long Indictment’’; the other contained 6 counts alleging 2 separate offenses and also two distinct counts alleging acts of perjury. By their verdict the jury found appellant guilty of counts 2 and 5 of the “Short Indictment”. The trial court directed a verdict of not guilty on the perjury counts and the jury disagreed as to all of the remaining counts. The court denied appellant’s motion for a new trial, but granted his application for probation.

The counts upon which appellant was convicted charged two separate violations of section 425 of the Penal Code, which reads as follows:

Sections 3750 and 3754 of the Political Code also apply to the case at bar, and are as follows:

Appellant urges three grounds of appeal. (1) That the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict. (2) Errors of the court in the admission of certain evidence. (3) Error of the court in refusing to give defendant’s requested instructions.

At the outset it will be observed that an appellate court has nothing to do with weighing the evidence on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.