Clark v. Berlin Realty Co.

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 163·33 Cal. App. 50·164 P. 333·164 P.2d 333
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 1917Civ. No. 2206.California1,817 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

Judgment in this action was for the plaintiff. The appeal is taken from the judgment and from an order denying the motion made by the defendant for a new trial. Plaintiff, as assignee of the Merchants’ National Bank of Los Angeles, brought this action for recovery against the defendant on account of an indebtedness created by the Berlin Dye Works & Laundry Company, a corporation, of which latter corporation defendant was at certain times material herein a stockholder and the owner of 209,535 shares of stock. The total capital of the Berlin Dye Works & Laundry Company was represented by three hundred thousand shares, all of which had been issued. Recovery was sought against the defendant for its proportionate liability as a stockholder. Plaintiff in his amended complaint, upon which issue was joined and trial had, alleged first in detail the fact of the corporate existence of the Berlin Realty Company and the Berlin Dye Works & Laundry Company. He then set out in the first cause of action that the Merchants’ National Bank, on April 1, 1911, loaned to the Berlin Dye Works & Laundry Company (which for convenience we will hereinafter refer to as “the Laundry Company”) the sum of eight…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.