Sullivan

Sullivan v. Shea

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 256·32 Cal. App. 369·162 P. 925
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 18, 1916Civ. No. 1781.California1,166 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

This is an action brought by Hannah Sullivan, as administratrix of the estate of James J. Sullivan, deceased, against Timothy Shea upon a promissory note for one thousand dollars, money alleged to have _ been borrowed by Shea from Sullivan in his lifetime. The complaint, alleging that the promissory note had been lost, set forth its terms, and the answer admitted the execution of the note substantially in the terms set forth.

In the year 1910 the deceased loaned to the defendant the sum of one thousand dollars, without taking therefor a note, receipt, or other evidence of the transaction. About a year later, when the decedent was about -to depart for a visit to Ireland, Shea executed in his favor the note in suit. Upon Sullivan’s return he took up his abode with Shea and his wife, at whose home he remained for three or four months. The relationship between him and the Sheas was close and intimate, particularly as regards Mrs. Shea, who was his niece. Before leaving for Ireland, in a conversation concerning the loan, Sullivan told Mrs. Shea he did not care whether he ever got any of the money back; that Mrs. Shea and her husband were the best friends he had, and were more entitled…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.