Action fob Rape—Weight of Uncorroborated Testimony—Question for Jury—Appeal.—In an action to recover damages for a criminal assault upon a single woman, the weight to be given uncorroborated testimony is a matter solely for the consideration of the jury, unless it is inherently improbable, and its conclusion is conclusive upon the appellate court.

Id. — Argument to Jury — Comparison of Child With Defendant — Lack of Prejudicial Error.—In such an action a remark made by plaintiff's counsel in his argument to the jury, requesting them to compare the child to which the plaintiff gave birth with the defendant, is not prejudicial, in the absence of anything in the record showing whether or not it bore any resemblance to the defendant, or that the defendant was prejudiced by the remark.

Id. — Previous Chastity of Plaintiff — Evidence of Damages—Instruction Limiting Evidence—Lack of Prejudice.—The defendant is not prejudiced by the giving of an instruction limiting the purpose of evidence of previous chastity of the plaintiff to the question of damages suffered, where his defense is an alibi, and not that the plaintiff consented to the act.

Id.—Compensatory Damages for "Act Complained of”—Proper Instruction.—An instruction that compensatory damages should be given in such amount as will fairly compensate the plaintiff for the injury she has received by reason of the “act complained of,” “taking into consideration her physical suffering and disability during pregnancy and in childbirth, if the jury should find the pregnancy was the result of defendant’s act, also her mental suffering, shame, and disgrace, and her loss of social standing, and all other harm they find she suffered as the natural result of the wrong,” is not an invasion of the right of the jury by telling them that damages should be awarded regardless of whether she gave her consent or not.