Koehn

Kern Valley Bank v. Koehn

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 247·125 P. 358
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 10, 1912Civ. No. 1102.California572 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Action to recover upon a promissory note. Judgment went for plaintiff in accordance with the verdict of a jury to which the issues were submitted for trial. Defendant appeals from the judgment and an order of the court denying his motion for a new trial.

The execution of the note was admitted. As an affirmative defense it was alleged the note was made without consideration and that it was given in renewal of a former note made and executed by defendant to plaintiff, which first note at the time of executing the note herein involved had been paid by the transfer to the bank of certain personal property which, though transferred as a pledge to secure payment of said first note, was, in case defendant failed to pay the same at maturity, to be accepted by the bank in full payment and satisfaction of the indebtedness evidenced thereby. He made default in the payment thereof, and notwithstanding the alleged agreement, he gave the new note herein sued upon, which he says was requested by the bank as a matter of form only in order to balance its books. It is apparent from the verdict of the jury that it gave little weight to the meager evidence offered in support of these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.