Feeny

Feeny v. Smiley

Good Law
115 Cal. App. 597·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 766·2 P.2d 220
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 23, 1931Docket No. 4292.California1,121 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jamison, J.

The main contention of the appellants on this appeal is that the evidence is not sufficient to support the judgment.

It is admitted that on the twenty-fifth day of April, 1927, defendant William F. Smiley was, by written instrument, appointed the trustee of plaintiff to receive for her certain money amounting to $8,500 from Orson L, Early, and that on or about the fifth day of August, 1927, the appellant William F. Smiley had in his possession, as such trustee, under said written instrument a sum in excess of $1500, which he had received from the said Early.

There was evidence produced 'on the part of plaintiff to the effect that she reposed confidence and trust in appellant William F. Smiley, and for that reason had appointed him her trustee; that on or about the fifth day of August, 1927, appellant William F. Smiley represented to respondent that he was in trouble with one Minnie Handley to whom he had sold a tract of land for $5,250; that she was suing him for the return of her money; that he desired respondent to help him out of said difficulty by buying said tract of land, and that if she would do so, he would sell the same within a short -time and make her a profit,. or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.