Hernandez

Hernandez v. Santiago Orange Growers' Ass'n

Good Law
110 Cal. App. 229·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 83·293 P. 875
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 4, 1930Docket No. 17.California2,711 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Barnard, J.

This is an action for damages ■ for the death of the minor son of the plaintiff. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, a motion for a nonsuit was granted by the trial court, and from the judgment which followed, this appeal is taken. The facts are not disputed and the only question presented is whether or not the case falls within the scope of the attractive nuisance doctrine.

Briefly stated, the facts are as follows: For more than eleven years prior to August 29, 1929, defendant had operated a plant in the city of Orange, California, situated along the tracks of the Santa Fe Railroad. As a part of its business, defendant iced refrigerator-cars as they stood upon the railroad track. This was done by means of an ice-loading platform about eight feet in width and eighty feet in length, and a chute leading from the platform to the top of the cars. There was a space of about three and one-half feet between the platform and the side of the car, and the platform was a few inches higher than the top of the car. The defendant had built a fence around the outer edge of the platform to keep the ice from falling off. In the process of icing cars, blocks of ice weighing about three hundred…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.