McClellan
McClellan v. State of California
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Kerrigan, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiff, as assignee of a large number of corporations, for the recovery of various amounts aggregating the sum of $71,680.50, paid by them to the Secretary of State under the provisions of the annual corporation license tax law.
Demurrers, both general and special, on behalf of the state and the other defendants were interposed, which demurrers were sustained by the trial court upon the ground that the court had no jurisdiction of the subject of the action, for the reason that the plaintiff could not maintain an action against the state without its consent.
The defendants, Frank C. Jordan and Friend W. Richardson, are officers of and represent the state, and the state is the real party against whom the relief is sought; and if the ruling of the trial court is correct, all of the defendants fall within the rule of prohibition.
There is not now, nor has there ever been, any statute of this state authorizing anyone to institute against the state, or any of its officers, an action for the recovery of any fee or sum of money of the character here involved. The only statute permitting the institution of such suits is the act of February 28, 1893…