Robbins

Robbins v. Mulcrevy

Good Law
101 Cal. App. 300·1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 235·281 P. 668
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 1929Docket No. 7179.California422 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tyler, J.

Mandamus to compel respondent to ex punge the entry of an order with reference to the payment of alimony pendente lite from the 11 Judgment Docket Book.”

The facts show that on November 16, 1922, petitioner filed a complaint in an action for divorce; on February 14, 1923, defendant therein filed a demurrer to the complaint. On November 1, 1923, the court made an order directing petitioner to pay his wife $75 per month alimony pendente lite, and $150 attorney fees. Thereafter the attorney for de fendant caused said order to be entered in the “Judgment Book’’ and in the “Judgment Docket Book.’’ On October 3, 1929, petitioner dismissed his action without prejudice to the bringing of a new one. Thereafter he demanded that the clerk expunge the entries from the books referred to, on the ground that he transcended his authority in making the entries, as the order for the payment of alimony and attorney’s fees was not a judgment, and had no place therein. Upon the refusal of the clerk to comply with the request this proceeding was instituted.

The petition is without merit. A decree for temporary alimony in a matrimonial cause is, to all legal intents and purposes, a judgment, and not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.