Willis

Willis v. Superior Court

Good Law
130 Cal. App. 766·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 1025·20 P.2d 994
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 3, 1933Docket No. 4902.California1,078 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pullen, J.

The petitioner, Alio Willis, a minor, by her guardian ad litem, commenced an action in the Superior Court of Mendocino County for personal injuries sustained by her while a passenger in the automobile of the defendant named.

Thereafter petitioner sought leave of the court to further prosecute the action in forma pauperis. From an order denying permission to so prosecute, petitioner, by this writ of mandate, seeks to gain such right. That courts of this state have the power to remit the payment of fees is well established. (Martin v. Superior Court, 176 Cal. 289 [ 168 Pac. 135 , L. R. A. 1918B, 313]; Watt v. Superior Court, 35 Cal. App. 330 [ 169 Pac. 916 ]; Hammond v. Justice’s Court, 37 Cal. App. 506 [ 174 Pac. 69 ].) In fact, such right is not disputed by the respondents herein, but they base their objection to the granting of the request in this instance in that petitioner herein has not made a sufficient showing of her inability to entitle her to such an order.

The application to the trial court being based entirely upon affidavits, let us examine the facts so presented upon behalf of petitioner in support of the motion.

Alio Willis, the petitioner, sets forth in her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.