Kneese

Federal Construction Co. v. Kneese

Good Law
37 Cal. App. 659·174 P. 694
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 26, 1918Civ. No. 2466.California1,768 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Beasly, J.

The Federal Construction Company petitions for a writ of mandate to compel the superintendent of streets of Daly City to sign a contract for the improvement of certain streets of that municipality pursuant to proceedings taken by its board of trustees-under the Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730), in conjunction with the act amendatory thereof of 1915 (Stats. 1915, p. 1464).

The case is an amicable one instituted for the purpose of determining the validity of the proceeding involved to the point which they have reached.

The first objection to the proceedings is that the streets involved are not mentioned by their official names in the resolution of intention. It is provided in section 3 of the Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 733) that the streets to be improved may be referred to by the names by which they are commonly known, and this was done.

The next objection is that the resolution of intention is uncertain in some particulars. The plans, however, which accompanied the resolution of intention, and the specifications that are referred to therein, if we understand counsel correctly, answer these objections by making the lines, which it might be impossible-…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.