Elliott

Elliott v. Bailey

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 177·50 Cal. App. 667·195 P. 717
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 28, 1920Civ. No. 3649.California956 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action brought by the plaintiff on his own behalf and also as the assignee of certain other parties to recover certain sums of money alleged to be due for services rendered and advances made.

The facts were substantially these: The defendants, who were copartners in a real estate business, which included, among other activities, the promotion of mining enterprises, undertook to promote the development of certain mining claims lying in the vicinity of Las Vegas, Nevada. These mining claims had been located by a number of persons, among whom were J. K. Mildebrandt and H. F. Christie. The plans pf the defendants contemplated the formation of some sort of organization to exploit these claims. Prior to the formation of this organization, and in a sense essential to its successful operation, it was necessary to have certain assays made of the ores and minerals of these claims. The plaintiff, Alexander T. Elliott, was a professor of chemistry, and as such was an expert analytical and chemical assayer of ores and minerals, and to him the defendant Cox, representing his firm, applied for the purpose of securing his services…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.