Schaffner

County of Los Angeles v. Schaffner

Good Law
88 Cal. App. 385·263 P. 833
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 1928Docket No. 5008.California860 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hahn, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff rendered in an action to recover on a hail bond. The case comes up on the judgment-roll alone.

It appears from the complaint that one Dan Dubreville was arraigned on a charge of violation of the Wright Act [Stats. 1921, p. 79], He waived preliminary examination and was bound over for trial to the superior court, at which time the committing magistrate fixed his bond at one thousand dollars. The defendants qualified as sureties on this bond, and Dubreville was released from custody-pending trial. The bail bond in this action is in the usual form, the sureties undertaking that Dubreville would hold himself amenable to the orders and process of the court, etc.

It further appears from the complaint that after his release the district attorney of Los Angeles County on October 5, 1923, filed in the superior court an information charging him with the offense for which he was bound over. The complaint further alleges that on October 8, 1923, the case of People of the State of California, Plaintiff, v. Dan Dubreville, Defendant, being No. 20877, was duly and regularly called in Department 12 of the superior court for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.