Bayer

Bayer v. Hoagland

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 583·95 Cal. App. 403·273 P. 58
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 12, 1928Docket No. 3641.California3,937 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tuttle, J.

This is an action brought to foreclose a deed of trust. The trial court refused to permit plaintiff to introduce any evidence, upon the ground that the complaint did not state a cause of action. Plaintiff was given an opportunity to amend his complaint, but he did not do so, and judgment was entered for defendant. Prom this judgment the appeal is taken.

The complaint alleges the execution of a promissory note for $4,000, and a deed of trust for the payment of the same (a copy of each of said instruments is attached to the complaint) ; that plaintiffs had expended the sum of $27 for insurance upon the premises described in the trust deed, and that the trustees had refused to pay the same, as provided in said trust deed; that the trustors had failed to pay two installments of $38 each, due under the terms of the promissory note in connection with which the trust deed was executed; that that trust deed was intended, and agreed by the parties to be and operate simply as a first lien or a first mortgage upon said premises, and as security for the payment of the debt; that plaintiff had requested the trustee to foreclose said trust deed, in the nature of a first lien or a first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.