Minaker

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court dismissing a writ of review and affirming all the proceedings of the board of medical examiners of the state of California in revoking appellant’s license to practice medicine and surgery in the state of California.

The action of the medical board was taken after a hearing duly and regularly had upon a complaint charging appellant “with having been guilty of unprofessional conduct under the 1st subdivision of section 14 of the Medical Practice Act of the state of California [Stats. 1917, p. 93], by . . . procuring, aiding and abetting and attempting, agreeing and offering to procure a criminal abortion upon a pregnant woman ... on or about the 28th day of May, 1919, in the city and county of San Francisco, State of California.”

Appellant’s contention is that the medical board received at the hearing considerable hearsay testimony and other evidence not admissible. Reliance is placed upon the case of Thrasher v. Board of Medical Examiners, 44 Cal. App. 26 [ 185 Pac. 1006 ], because of its holding that hearsay evidence is inadmissible in a proceeding such as this one. In the last-mentioned case, the appellate court annulled…