Clairmonte

Clairmonte v. Napier Motor Co. of America

Good Law
11 Cal. App. 265·1909 Cal. App. LEXIS 164·104 P. 712
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 1909Civ. No. 632.California875 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Allen, J.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment entered against it and in plaintiff's favor.

The action was • submitted upon an agreed statement of , facts, which may be summarized as follows: The defendant manufacturer had appointed plaintiff its exclusive agent for the sale of motor cars in the district of Los Angeles upon an agreed compensation of twenty per cent discount. Preceding September, 1906, the business had been conducted in the manner following: When plaintiff ordered a car he purchased the same of defendant in his own name and the car was shipped to him personally; the bill of lading was accompanied by a draft drawn by defendant upon plaintiff for the list price of the car less twenty per cent. In September, 1906, a lady who had been solicited by plaintiff to buy a car, -was given a letter of introduction by plaintiff to defendant and this customer purchased a car directly from defendant, paying defendant a third in cash and agreeing to pay the balance upon delivery of ear at Los Angeles. Defendant accordingly shipped the car to the purchaser and through a Boston bank drew for the unpaid balance. The bank purchased the draft • in good faith and credited defendant with the face…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.