Growall

Growall v. Pacific Surety Co.

Good Law
1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 335·21 Cal. App. 185·131 P. 73
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 1913Civ. No. 1134.California794 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hall, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant upon a bond given by defendant to secure the faithful performance by one Evans of a contract to erect a building for plaintiff. Defendant moved for a new trial, which being denied defendant appealed to this court both from the judgment and the order.

The building contract was in all respects valid, and was duly filed in the recorder’s office.

Evans, the contractor, abandoned the contract before completion, and plaintiff completed the building according to the original plans and specifications. By this action he sought to recover the excess in the total cost of the building over the contract price, claimed to be $633.15, and also $250 attorneys’ fees paid, and $54.75 costs incurred in defending two suits, brought by lien claimants against him and the original contractor.

The court found in favor of plaintiff, and gave judgment for the amount prayed for.

1. As to the finding to the effect that plaintiff was compelled to pay to complete the building any sum in excess of the original contract price, it is claimed by appellant that such finding finds no support in the evidence.

This contention must be sustained. The contract was for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.