McGregor

McGregor v. Wright

Good Law
117 Cal. App. 186·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 382·3 P.2d 624
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 1931Docket No. 456.California4,854 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Allen, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit as to both causes of action set out in the complaint.

It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiff was a resident of San Diego County and was highly respected and of high standing in the community, occupied a high position in and had the confidence of the business world and was generally recognized in the community as a business man of the highest integrity and capability. That defendants were attorneys at law duly admitted to practice in the courts of California and the United States courts sitting in California ; that such defendants were and are engaged in the practice of law as partners under the firm name of Wright, McKee and C. M. Monroe. On the twenty-sixth day of January, 1927, plaintiff was elected trustee in the matter of the bankruptcy of Stephens & Company, a bankrupt, then pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Such appointment was obtained by and on the recommendation of the defendants to the creditors of the bankrupt estate. Plaintiff duly qualified and entered upon the duties pertaining to such trust. Defendants, while attorneys for certain creditors of said bankrupt…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.